Legal Opinion

Rolen v. Rauhuff

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided August 13, 1970No. Civ. A. No. 6896PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

ROBERT L. TAYLOR, District Judge.

Plaintiff, J. E. Rolen, filed this action to recover damages against defendants, Millard R. Gibson, Sheriff, Roy Gibson, Deputy Sheriff and O. P. Rauhuff, Jr., Constable, all of Sevier County, and Western Surety Company, hereafter called Western, surety on the official bonds of the Gibsons and Rauhuff. By stipulation, the case against the Gibsons was dismissed without prejudice. Motions for summary judgment by Western were denied without prejudice to renew at the conclusion of the proof on the merits. The case on the merits was tried before a jury…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Leggett v. HumphreysSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
  2. Standard Accident Ins. Co. v. Knox, Recr.Texas Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Salo v. Pacific Coast Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Humphreys v. Leggett, Smith, & LawrenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  5. Bill Curphy Co. v. ElliottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Peerless Ins. Co. v. SOUTH BOSTON STORAGE WAREHOUSEMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  2. Peerless Insurance v. South Boston Storage & Warehouse, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API