Legal Opinion

State v. Ainsworth

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 22, 1989No. 85-3451-C-2 85-3452-C-2 CA A41480 (Control) CA A41596PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*242BUTTLER, J.

In these consolidated cases, defendants, husband and wife, appeal their convictions for manufacture and possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. They contend that the trial court erred in denying their motion to suppress evidence seized from their property pursuant to a search warrant based on information obtained without a warrant by police officers who were riding in a helicopter looking for marijuana that they had heard was growing on defendants’ property. The question is whether that information was obtained in violation of defendants’ privacy rights under Article I,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. California v. CiraoloSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. State v. OwensOregon Supreme Court · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. AinsworthOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. FaulknerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  3. State v. GohringOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. NevlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  5. State v. GohringCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API