Legal Opinion
Rusiski v. Pribonic
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 30, 1984No. 152PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge:
This appeal arises from an equity action requesting specific performance of an agreement of sale for the purchase of improved real property.
Appellants Edward M. and Andrea E. Pribonic (Pribonics/appellants) are the owners of a tract of real property, an improved portion of which they desired to sell. Appellees Robert J. and Margaret M. Rusiski (Rusiskis/appellees), plaintiffs below, entered into a sales agreement with the Pribonics on December 2, 1978 for the purchase of the improved property for the sum of $63,900.00. The Rusiskis also tendered $1,500.00 to the Pribonics in…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Steuart v. McChesneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Field v. Golden Triangle Broadcasting, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- East Crossroads Center, Inc. v. Mellon-Stuart Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- McFadden v. American Oil Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- In Re Estate of BreyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- 26 Collier bankr.cas.2d 663, Bankr. L. Rep. P 74,447 in Re Allegheny International, Inc. J. Daniel SnyderCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- In re Allegheny International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Rusiski v. PribonicSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Philmar Mid-Atlantic, Inc. v. York Street Associates IISupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Cobaugh v. Klick-Lewis, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.