Legal Opinion

State v. O.V.

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 2008PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Eileen Bransten, J.

The State of New York moves to establish probable cause to believe that O.V is a “sex offender requiring civil management” pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law article 10, § 10.06 (k).

O.V opposes the motion.

Background

On December 12, 2007, this court held a hearing to ascertain whether there is probable cause to believe that O.V is a “sex offender requiring civil management.”

Initially, the State established that, on May 18, 1979, O.V was convicted of two counts of rape in the first degree and two counts of criminal possession of a weapon — a knife — in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. JuncoNew York Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. PedrazaNew York Supreme Court · 2007

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. BrooksNew York Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. P.H.New York Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. AnonymousAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API