Legal Opinion

People v. Davis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 8, 1993PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Charles J. Tejada, J.), entered July 8, 1992, which granted defendant’s motion to suppress physical evidence and statements after a combined Mapp/Huntley hearing, unanimously reversed, on the law, and the indictment reinstated.

Defendant had been charged with criminal sale and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree. On appeal, the People argue that on the facts presented, the police had probable cause to arrest defendant and, accordingly, that despite the lack of a formal arrest, they had the authority to frisk him.

The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. De BourNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. People v. McRayNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. People v. LandyNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. People v. DentiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  5. People v. RiveraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re Curtis H.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. People v. BrooksNew York Supreme Court · 2008
  3. People v. PacerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. People v. ValenzuelaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API