Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Thomas

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1986No. Civ. 10969PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVINE,' Justice.

Merlyn Thomas appeals from the order of the District Court of Stark County denying his motion to vacate an amended judgment. We consider the propriety of serving a motion to amend judgment upon a party, rather than upon the attorney who represented that party in the initial divorce action. We affirm.

When Merlyn and Betty Thomas were divorced in Stark County in 1977, Betty was represented by attorney Robert Baird and Merlyn was represented by attorney Mark Greenwood. Pursuant to the divorce judgment, Betty was awarded custody of the three minor children and Merlyn was ordered…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kinsella v. KinsellaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Shark v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Balchen v. BalchenAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  4. McClelland v. PierceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Scarth v. ScarthOregon Supreme Court · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wall v. LewisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Riemers v. OmdahlNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. AndersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Cordie v. TankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Rowley v. CleaverNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API