Legal Opinion

Rowley v. Cleaver

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1999No. 990003PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Barry Cleaver appeals from the amended judgment of the district court increasing the amount of child support he is required to pay. We are asked to decide what notice must be given for a court to change its previous child support order. We conclude service under Rule 5, not Rule 4, of the North Dakota Rules of Civil Procedure is sufficient, and affirm.

I

[¶ 2] Barry Cleaver and Shauna Sather, formerly known as Cleaver and as Rowley, were divorced in Grand Forks, North Dakota, in September 1991. They had two children, who were nine and seven years old at the time of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kinsella v. KinsellaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Steffes v. SteffesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Larson v. DunnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Messer v. BenderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Hershey v. HersheySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kopp v. KoppNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Intercept Corp. v. Calima Financial, LLCNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Isaacson v. IsaacsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. EhliNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Gustafson v. PoitraNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API