Legal Opinion
Riemers v. Omdahl
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided October 12, 2004No. 20040099PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARING, Justice.
[¶ 1] Roland C. Riemers appealed from a summary judgment dismissing his legal malpractice action against Steve Simonson and Thomas Omdahl. We hold Riemers’ malpractice claims are barred by the statute of limitations, and we affirm.
I
[¶ 2] Simonson worked as a lawyer at Omdahl’s law firm until October 2000. In March 1999, Simonson helped prepare a premarital agreement for Riemers and Je-nese Peters-Riemers. In March 2000, Riemers retained Simonson to defend him against an aggravated assault charge stemming from Riemers’ altercation with Peters-Riemers. Riemers subsequently pled…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Addison v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Budd v. NixenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Wall v. LewisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Binstock v. TschiderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Zuger v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- First National Bank & Trust Co. of Williston v. SolbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Best Choice Fund, LLC v. Low & Childers, P.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Superior, Inc. v. Behlen Mfg. Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Canavan v. Lovett, Schefrin and HarnettSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
- State v. HansenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.