Legal Opinion

Board of Medical Registration & Examination v. Bowman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1958No. 29,536PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant’s original brief fails to contain a copy of the assignment of errors or any specification thereof. Nor does it state the substance of any assignment so that it could be held there was a substantial compliance with the rules on appellate procedure.

These rules are based upon experience, and are designed to expedite the disposition of appeals, as well as lessen costs and expenses for the parties. The rules do not require the record on appeal be printed so that each Judge may have a copy. Appellant’s original brief is required to be prepared in such manner that a printed copy of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. BOARD OF MED. REGIST. AND EXAM., ETC. v. BowmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Witte v. WITTEIndiana Court of Appeals · 1953
  3. HUGHES v. St. Bank of W. Terre HauteIndiana Court of Appeals · 1954
  4. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. NewkirkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Hauser v. MarkwellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. BOARD OF MED. REGIST. AND EXAM., ETC. v. BowmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Joslin v. Ketcham, Admr. Etc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1959
  3. Hagman v. HagmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API