Legal Opinion

Provost v. Regents of University of California

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 14, 2011No. G043523PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RYLAARSDAM, Acting P. J.

Plaintiff Glenn Provost appeals from a judgment entered pursuant to a stipulation for settlement reached at mediation with defendant Regents of the University of California (Regents). He asserts the stipulation was not binding for a host of reasons, including that it was not properly executed by Regents or executed by defendants Peter H. Breen and Cindy Anderson at all, conditions precedent to its finality were not satisfied, it did not contain all material terms, it was obtained by duress and coercion, evidence on which he might have relied in considering…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Nwosu v. UbaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  3. Miklosy v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Benach v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Reichardt v. HoffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Dinslage v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. Children etc. Com. of Fresno County v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. People ex rel. Feuer v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. E. J. Franks Construction Inc. v. SahotaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. A.B. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API