Legal Opinion
Kutas v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided June 9, 1987No. Claim No. 72617PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Frank S. Rossetti, J.
Claimant’s motion for summary judgment is denied and defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment is granted and the claim is dismissed, in accordance with the following.
*1045The subject contract claim is for retirement benefits allegedly due claimant from the New York State Employees’ Retirement System (System; see, n 1, supra). The relevant facts are essentially undisputed.
On November 18, 1971 Charles Kutas was hired by the State Department of Motor Vehicles (Department) as a clerk. He was then 73 years of age, having been born October 23, 1898. However,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Hadden v. Consolidated Edison Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Hadden v. Consolidated Edison Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Glassman v. GlassmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Sgaglione v. LevittNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Kleinfeldt v. New York City Employees' Retirement SystemNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pilarczyk v. Morrison Knudsen Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1997
- Kutas v. New York State Employees' Retirement SystemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Young v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1999
- Hartford v. Local Union No.Connecticut Superior Court · 2003
- Nickels v. New York City Housing AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1994