Legal Opinion

Kleinfeldt v. New York City Employees' Retirement System

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 18, 1975PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Judge Breitel.

In a class action the New York City Employees’ Retirement System and the State’s Attorney-General, as intervener, appeal from the granting of a summary declaratory judgment to plaintiff, a New York City transit employee. The judgment declared that subdivision 4 of section 431 of the Retirement and Social Security Law, as applied to any civil service employee who became a member of a public retirement system before the statute’s effective date, violates section 7 of article V of the State Constitution.

The issue is whether the recently enacted statutory limitation on the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Roddy v. ValentineNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  2. Day v. MrukNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. Cashman v. Teachers' Retirement BoardNew York Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Cashman v. Teachers' Retirement BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  5. Fisher v. New York State Employees' Retirement SystemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Kanerva v. WeemsIllinois Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Kraus v. Board of Trustees of Police Pension FundAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  3. Wash. Fed'n of State Employees Council 28 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. McDermott v. McDermottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  5. Fields v. Elected Officials' Retirement PlanArizona Supreme Court · 2014

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API