Legal Opinion
State v. Skoog
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 10, 1984No. CX-84-581PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POPOVICH, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal by the state, pursuant to Rule 28.04, subd. 1 of the Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure, of a pretrial order of the district court granting respondent’s motion to suppress evidence seized and ordering a dismissal of the complaint because of no probable cause. The state contends the police officer had probable cause to believe a snowblower protruding from the trunk of respondent’s car, which had been lawfully stopped, may have been stolen by the respondent. We affirm.
FACTS
On December 4, 1983 at about 10:30 p.m., a Brainerd police officer…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. MunozCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- State v. LembkeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- In re the Proposed Disciplinary Action Against the Dentist License of SchultzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.