Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 6, 1991No. CX-90-539PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCHUMACHER, Judge.

Appellant Lester Lee Smith sought review of his conviction for unlawful possession of a schedule II narcotic controlled substance, alleging denial of his sixth amendment right to effective assistance of counsel, invalid arrest, and prosecutorial misconduct. The trial court upheld the jury verdict and denied appellant’s motion for a new trial. We affirm.

*732PACTS

After observing suspicious activities by appellant at an apartment building known by police to be a “crack house,” Minneapolis police officers decided to arrest him for the misdemeanor offense of loitering with…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Paul Peter Solina, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  4. State v. TureSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. United States v. Barbara Mouzin, United States of America v. Alfonso CarvajalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Adkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2004
  2. People v. AllenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  4. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API