Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re the Proposed Disciplinary Action Against the Dentist License of Schultz

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 15, 1985No. C9-85-761PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*512OPINION

SEDGWICK, Judge.

Roger Schultz, DDS, appeals by writ of certiorari from an order of the Minnesota Board of Dentistry suspending him indefinitely from the practice of dentistry and imposing conditions for reinstatement. Schultz contends that the Board’s suspension of his license is illegal, its findings are unsupported by substantial evidence, and the findings do not warrant discipline.

We affirm.

FACTS

Roger Schultz has been licensed to practice dentistry in Minnesota since 1967. The Board of Dentistry initiated proceedings to determine whether his license should be revoked, suspended,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re the Revocation of the License of PolkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  2. State v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. Reyburn v. Minnesota State Board of OptometrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  4. Manufactured Housing Institute v. PettersenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Matter of Schultz, Etc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Johnson v. Board of Governors of Registered DentistsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  3. Johnson v. Board of Governors of Registered DentistsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API