Mayberry v. Cook
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying a new trial. Lucien Shaw, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
HAYNES, C.
The defendants appeal from the judgment and from an order denying their motion for a new trial. The action was tried by the court without a jury.
The complaint alleged that the defendants were copartners •doing business as factors and commission merchants at the city of Los Angeles; that plaintiff from time to time consigned to defendants oranges belonging to him, to he sold by defend*589ants as factors and commission merchants, on account of the plaintiff, and that on September 7, 1893, an account was stated between plaintiff and defendants, upon which there was found to be due to the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Auzerais v. NagleeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Herrlich v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Coffee v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Hendy v. MarchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Terry v. SicklesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Trafton v. YoungbloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Shapiro v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Lacy Manufacturing Co. v. Gold Crown Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- California Bean Growers Ass'n v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. ShermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.