Legal Opinion
Preston v. Keith
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 13, 1990No. 7941PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.
The named plaintiff, Rebecca Preston, sued the defendants for personal injuries incurred as a result of an automobile accident allegedly caused by the defendant Anthony Keith’s negligence.1 The jury found that the plaintiff was 50 percent contributorily negligent and returned a verdict in favor of the plain*658tiff in the amount of $5593.50. Thereafter, the plaintiff made motions for additur, to set aside the verdict and for a new trial. The trial court denied all of the plaintiffs motions and this appeal ensued.
On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court erred (1) in instructing the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- McClelland v. Climax Hosiery MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Michaud v. SteckinoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- Wei Ping Wu v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Trzcinski v. RicheySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Castaldo v. D'ERAMOSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Preston v. KeithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Keans v. BocciarelliConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Tesler v. JohnsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- Baystate Moving Systems, Inc. v. BowmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Lynch v. Granby Holdings, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.