Legal Opinion

Piccicuto v. Dwyer

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided February 13, 1992No. 90-P-908PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

This doomed appeal is a hapless attack on the

weight of the evidence before the jury and on the trial judge’s findings on claims reserved to him. 2a Conspicuously, the defendants fail to cite any of those findings as being clearly erroneous. For the most part, the claims of error “are in reality directed toward the weight and credibility of the evidence, a matter wholly within the province of the [fact finder].” Commonwealth v. Nardone, 406 Mass. 123, 129-130 (1989). 3 In any event, the jury’s verdict, rendered on special questions respecting claims of intentional interference with an…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anthony's Pier Four, Inc. v. HBC ASSOCIATESMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Levings v. Forbes & Wallace, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  3. United Truck Leasing Corp. v. GeltmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  4. Solimene v. B. GRAUEL & CO., KGMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  5. Yorke Management v. CastroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Atkinson v. RosenthalMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
  2. Richard Piccicuto D/B/A Sheehan's Cafe v. Ralph E. Dwyer, Richard Piccicuto v. Linda L. RexCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  3. Worcester-Tatnuck Square CVS, Inc. v. KaplanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
  4. Britt v. RosenbergMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
  5. Piccicuto v. Rex (In Re Rex)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1993

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API