Legal Opinion

State v. Scott

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 5, 2021No. A167219PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

175 Submitted October 4, 2019; portion of judgment requiring defendant to pay attorney fees reversed, otherwise affirmed May 5; petition for review denied September 16, 2021 ( 368 Or 561) STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JARROD TOLMAN SCOTT, Defendant-Appellant. Tillamook County Circuit Court 16CR33746; A167219

488 P3d 803

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for fleeing or attempting to elude a police officer and another crime. Defendant argues that the trial court erred by refusing to provide the jury an instruction defining “intentionally” with respect to the attempting…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. JuryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  3. State v. CoverstoneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. State v. PayneOregon Supreme Court · 2020
  5. State v. CirauloOregon Supreme Court · 2020

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. DeandaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  2. State v. LauneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  3. Foreman v. WagnerDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025
  4. State v. DeandaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API