Legal Opinion
People v. Carter
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided April 9, 2015No. Court of Appeals No. 10CA1993PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by JUDGE FOX J.
¶ 1 In Part II, JUDGE FOX, joined by Judge Ney, concludes that the defendant's Miranda rights were violated during his custodial interrogation and the statements he made during the interrogation were erroneously admitted at trial.
¶ 2 In Part III, JUDGE FOX, joined in part by Judge Ney as to the unlawful distribution of a controlled substance only, concludes that the error, however, does not warrant *17reversal because it was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.
¶ 3 In Part IV, JUDGE FOX, joined by Judge J. Jones, addresses and rejects the defendant's contention that the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Fare v. Michael C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Missouri v. SeibertSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. SpringstedColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
- Shirehampton Drive Trust v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.District Court, D. Nevada · 2019