Legal Opinion

Bodkin v. Merit

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1885No. 11,721PublishedCited by 21 opinions

From the Switzerland Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The material allegations of the appellee’s complaint are these: That on the 23d day of December, 1878, the defendant James F. Bodkin was indebted to the National Bank of Rising Sun in the sum of $7,600, for which he had theretofore executed his promissory note, with James H. Merit as surety; that James F. Bodkin was also indebted to the First National Bank of Vevay in the sum of $600, for which he had executed his promissory note, with James H. Merit as surety; that Bodkin was still further indebted to Sarah Woods in the sum of $850, evidenced by his promissory note, on which James H. Merit…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dixon v. DukeIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Muir v. BerkshireIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Morrison v. CollierIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Reily v. BurtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Seller v. LingermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1865

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Stroup v. StroupIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Burrow v. Terre Haute & Logansport RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Backer v. PyneIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Bailey v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. Reed v. KalesbeckIndiana Supreme Court · 1896

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API