United States v. Lot 85, County Ridge
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL KELLY, Jr., Circuit Judge.
Appeal is taken from the district court’s order of forfeiture of one parcel of property located in the City of Lenexa, Kansas. We exercise jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.
Background,
Pursuant to a valid court order, law enforcement officials monitored Steven M. Mu-ehnick’s home at 8940 Hall in Lenexa, Kansas (“Lot 85”) for approximately two weeks in November and December, 1989. During that period, 154 telephone conversations involving drugs or drug use occurred at Lot 85; 94 of these conversations involved actual drug transactions. Based on…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Princess Lida of Thurn and Taxis v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Penn Central Casualty Co. v. Pennsylvania Ex Rel. SchnaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Donovan v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Predator International, Inc. v. Gamo Outdoor USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Youren v. Tintic School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Estate of Lockett ex rel. Lockett v. FallinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Jones v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
- Montez v. HickenlooperCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.