Legal Opinion
Youren v. Tintic School District
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 10, 2003No. 01-4131, 01-4144PublishedCited by 82 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HENRY, Circuit Judge.
These appeals arise from a case in which the plaintiff was Debra Youren and the defendants were the Tintic School District and two of its employees, superintendent Patricia Hunter-Rowse and teacher Ed Alder. Ms. Youren, a teacher formerly employed by Tintic, brought suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging claims for violation of her due process, free speech, and privacy rights, and state-law claims for wrongful termination and violation of the Utah Protection of Public Employees Act (the “Whistleblower Act”), Utah Code Ann.' §§ 67-21-1 to 67-21-9. Following a trial, a jury…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Robinson v. City of EdmondCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- Herrera v. City of EspanolaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
- Hardeman v. City of AlbuquerqueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. SandersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Robert Cortez v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Jeffrey Klingenberg v. Vulcan Ladder USA, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.