Legal Opinion

Moore v. Tumwater Paper Mills Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1935No. 25294. Department TwoPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

This is an action brought by a bondholder to foreclose a securing trust deed, or mortgage. Subsequent to the filing of an amended complaint, a second bondholder intervened in the action and adopted the amendatory pleading as his own. Demurrers to the complaint and amended complaint having been sustained, the plaintiff and intervener declined to plead further, whereupon the court entered an order dismissing the action. From that order, this appeal was taken. The plaintiff and intervener, occupying the same position in the action, have joined in their briefs. They will hereinafter be referred…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Martin v. Bankers' Trust Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Continental & Commercial Trust & Savings Bank v. Allis-Chalmers Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1912
  3. Haynes v. Central Business Property Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Seibert v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  5. Thomle v. Soundview Pulp Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1935

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. D'ANDREA v. PringleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. Barber v. Grand Summitt Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Hill v. Goltry, TrusteeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  5. Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API