Legal Opinion

Barber v. Grand Summitt Mining Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1941No. 28493PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

F. C. Barber and L. S. Eastman, as joint plaintiffs, instituted this action against Grand Summitt Mining Company, Inc., and Winefred McMillan, Walter P. Tracey, and others, as defendants, setting forth in their amended complaint two causes of action, demanding upon the first cause of action thirty-five thousand dollars, and upon the second, one thousand dollars, each by way of damages for breach of contract.

In the first cause of action, plaintiffs alleged that September 30, 1938, they entered into an agreement with Grand Summitt Mining Company, Inc., hereinafter referred to as the company,…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Lough v. John Davis & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Dealtry v. Selectmen of WatertownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  3. Swann v. Sweetwater Irrigation & Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Murphy v. MurphyIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Patterson v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fleenor v. EricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Kane v. Mednax Services IncDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API