Tesar v. Bartels
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Bartos, District Judge.
This action in replevin was commenced in the municipal court for the city of Omaha, Nebraska, by the appellee, Rudolph Tesar, against Vern A. Bartels and Viola H. Bartels, appellants. For convenience the appellee will be hereafter designated as plaintiff and the appellants as defendants.
The plaintiff seeks to recover from the defendants the possession of over 1,100 articles of personal property enumerated in the affidavit for replevin. Most of the articles are such as are usually used in the operation of a beer tavern and restaurant.
*890The affidavit in replevin was filed…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Wails v. FarringtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Davenport v. Intermountain Railway, Light & Power Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1922
- Lincoln Joint Stock Land Bank v. BextenNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
- Beck v. DaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Reitz v. PetersenNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- 111 Scherr Lane, LLC v. Triangle General Contracting, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2017
- Hung Kwong Leung v. LawMississippi Supreme Court · 1971