Legal Opinion
Kingvision Pay Per View, Ltd. v. Bowers
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided December 18, 1998No. 97-2603-JWLPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LUNGSTRUM, District Judge.
This action arises from defendants’ allegedly unauthorized interception and televising of the Tyson-Seldon boxing match which took place on September 7, 1996. The case is presently before the court on the summary judgment motions of plaintiff (doc. 26) and defendants (doc. 25). For the reasons set forth below, the court denies both motions.
I. Facts
Plaintiff Kingvision Pay Per View, Ltd. (“Kingvision”) is a Delaware corporation that licenses various boxing matches to its customers on a pay-per-view basis. Defendants are the owners and operators of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- EF Hutton & Co. v. HeimSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Prostar v. MassachiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- KingVision Pay Per View, Ltd. v. Boom Town Saloon, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
- In Re Cases Filed by DIRECTV, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2004
- Kingvision Pay Per View, Ltd. v. WilsonDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2000
- Time Warner Cable National Division v. BubaczDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2001