Legal Opinion
Beams v. Norton
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided March 4, 2003No. 00-4124-SACPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CROW, District Senior Judge.
The case comes before the court on the defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Dk.64) and on the plaintiffs “motion to reconsolidate (sic) EEOC complaints” (Dk.69). This is an employment discrimination case in which the plaintiff alleges that the defendant discriminated against him on the basis of his gender, age, race, physical handicap, and retaliation by not re-employing him on six separate occasions.
MOTION TO REVIEW AND/OR MOTION TO AMEND
What the plaintiff has labeled a “motion to reeonsolidate” is actually a motion for this court either to…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Beams v. NortonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004
- Mohamed v. TattumDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2005
- Zamora v. Unified Government of Wyandotte County and Kansas City, KansasDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2019