Legal Opinion

Beams v. Norton

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided September 7, 2004No. 03-4072-JARPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CORRECTED MEMORANDUM ORDER AND OPINION GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDG MENT 1

ROBINSON, District Judge.

Plaintiff, who is pro se, brings this action alleging discrimination on the basis of sex, race, and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and age discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. This matter comes before the Court on defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 29). For the reasons stated below, defendant’s summary judgment motion is granted.

1. Summary Judgment Standards

Summary judgment is appropriate “if the pleadings,…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ford v. Sherwin-WilliamsDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2025
  2. Jackson v. Gragg AdvertisingDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2025
  3. Ngiendo v. University Partners, LLC.District Court, D. Kansas · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API