Legal Opinion
Mohamed v. Tattum
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided August 4, 2005No. 04-3165-JARPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ROBINSON, District Judge.
Lionel Mohamed, proceeding pro se, seeks monetary damages against defendant T. Tattum for civil rights violations. (Doc. 1.) Specifically, plaintiff claims that defendant failed to protect him from an attack by a fellow inmate at the United States Penitentiary in Leavenworth, Kansas (“USPL”) in violation of the Fifth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. Plaintiffs Complaint alleges jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 42 U.S.C. § 1986, 28 U.S.C. § 1343, 28 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Goldhaber v. HigginsDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- Bellamy (ID 53454) v. ClineDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2022
- KAREN CAHAIL, individually and as administrator of the estate of GALEN CAHAIL, deceased, et al. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al.District Court, D. Kansas · 2026