Legal Opinion
In Re Ifill
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 16, 2005No. 02-BG-1264, 03-BG-1487PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REID, Associate Judge:
Before us are consolidated disciplinary proceedings involving respondent Adrian P. Ifill, also known as Adrian Palmer Ifill. 1 One case is an original disciplinary proceeding commenced by the District of Columbia’s Bar Counsel, and the other is a reciprocal discipline proceeding resulting from action taken by Maryland attorney disciplinary authorities. The District of Columbia Board on Professional Responsibility (“the Board” or “the BPR”) has recommended as a sanction in the original disciplinary proceeding a one-year suspension, and restitution with interest as a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re ZilberbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- In Re ZdravkovichDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- In Re TempleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re StewartDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- In re BaileyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2022
- In re BaileyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2022
- In re BrownDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024
- In re BrownDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024