Legal Opinion
United States v. Roy Mandujano
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided October 16, 1974No. 73-3353PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TUTTLE, Circuit Judge:
On May 2, 1973, appellee Mandujano appeared as a witness before the DALE (Drug Abuse Law Enforcement) Grand Jury, pursuant to a subpoena. The following warnings were given Mandujano:
“Q: Now you are required to answer all the questions that I ask you except for the ones that you feel would tend to incriminate you. Do you understand that ?
A: Do I answer all the questions you ask.
Q: You have to answer all the questions except for those you think will incriminate you in the commission of a crime. Is that clear?
A: Yes, sir.
Q: You don’t have to answer questions which would…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Betts v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. Kenneth George MontosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Glickstein v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- United States v. HaldemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- United States v. MandujanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Roy MandujanoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. William Fred PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Estelle Jacobs A/K/A 'Mrs. Kramer,'Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.