Legal Opinion
Ringstad v. Grannis
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 31, 1947No. 11283PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Circuit Judge.
The complaint in this case is in ejectment. The issue was joined, the case proceeded to trial and at the close of the plaintiff’s case the court entered a judgment of nonsuit. Plaintiff appeals.
*271The complaint alleged that plaintiff “and her predecessor have been in the peaceable, adverse, open, notorious possession of the * * * property [described below] under col- or of title for more than thirty (30) years last past.” It also alleged defendants’ trespass in entering the property and tearing down a fence thereon and forcibly restraining possession thereof. The complaint…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wilson v. FineDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1889
- Hatcher v. Virginia Mining CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
- Carter's Administrator v. QuillenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- Inge v. GarrettIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- Campbell v. Silver Bow Basin Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1892
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Martha M. Kirk, an Adult, and Kenneth William Kirk, a Minor, Who Sues by His Guardian Ad Litem, Martha M. Kirk v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Ringstad v. GrannisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
- Mount v. CurranAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Gillespie v. WindustDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1956
- Brayton v. Boston Safe Deposit and Trust Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.