Legal Opinion
Gillespie v. Windust
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided August 24, 1956No. Civ. No. A-7723PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCARREY, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court upon a motion to set aside the verdict which awarded the plaintiff possession of certain property here in dispute, but which does not allow any damages for loss of *557rents and profits. A motion for a directed verdict, under rule 50, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., was made at the close of plaintiff’s evidence, which motion was denied.
This action arose in ejectment wherein the plaintiff sought to recover possession of certain real property from which he alleges the defendant, John Windust, had dispossessed him. The…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Dickerson v. ColgroveSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Kirk v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Mrs. Fern W. Reuter v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Bass v. RamosSupreme Court of Florida · 1909
- Hardy v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1863
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brandhagen v. BurtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
- Wright v. PriorAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
- Gwitchyaa Zhee Corporation v. AlexanderDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2020
- Prosch v. GabbardHigh Court of American Samoa · 1980