Legal Opinion

Martha M. Kirk, an Adult, and Kenneth William Kirk, a Minor, Who Sues by His Guardian Ad Litem, Martha M. Kirk v. The United States of America

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 24, 1956No. 19-17559PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment for the defendant in an action brought under the provisions of the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1346(b) and 2674 -to 2680. The plaintiffs, appellants here, are the widow and minor child of William M. Kirk, who lost his life when he fell from a scaffold upon which he was working as a carpenter during the construction of Lucky Peak Dam on the Boise River in Idaho. The action was predicated upon the wrongful death statute of that State, § 5-311, Idaho Code.

Lucky Peak Dam was being constructed in accordance with plans and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Indian Towing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Rossiter v. VogelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  4. Gifford v. NottinghamIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Lebak v. NelsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1940

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Sparling v. Hoffman Construction Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  2. Martha M. Kirk, an Adult, and Kenneth William Kirk, a Minor, Who Sues by His Guardian Ad Litem, Martha M. Kirk v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  3. Tucker v. Union Oil Co. of CaliforniaIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  4. House v. Mine Safety Appliances Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  5. Albert Roelofs, Jr. v. United States of America, the Travelers Insurance Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API