Legal Opinion

Mount v. Curran

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1981No. 4872PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a grant of partial summary judgment on an adverse possession claim. We reverse.

An action to quiet title to a tract of land in Fairbanks was brought by Mary Jane Curran, Thomas Curran, and the Parrish Co., their successor in interest. Curran alleged that she was the record title holder and owner in fee simple of Lots 6, 7A, and 7B, Block 95, of the Fairbanks townsite, as laid out in the survey known as the Robe Map of 1909. 1

James and Helen Mount, owners of Lot 8 (an adjacent lot), answered that portions of these lots (6, 7A, and 7B) were…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Reusens v. LawsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  2. Frandeka v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  3. Stepanov v. GavrilovichAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Ringstad v. GrannisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
  5. Whiteman v. MattsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Curran v. MountAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Leciejewski v. SedlakCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982
  3. Graham v. LambethCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1996
  4. Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports1995
  5. Mount v. CurranAlaska Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API