Legal Opinion
Marquis v. City of Waterloo
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided January 21, 1930No. 40161PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWagner, J.
The city of Waterloo has adopted an ordinance establishing restricted residence districts within the city, and providing a penalty for the violation thereof. Section 1 of said ordinance provides:. ‘ ‘ That the hereinafter bounded, property in the first ward in the city of Waterloo, Iowa, be and the same is hereby designated and established as a restricted residence district:” (Here follows description of real estate.)
Sections 2, 3, and 4 of said ordinance are identical with Section 1, except that they describe real estate in the second, third, and fourth wards of the city. The remaining…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Eubank v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Zahn v. Board of Public WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Gorieb v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Matter of Larkin Co. v. SchwabNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- City of Des Moines v. Manhattan Oil Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1921
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Ludlow v. GuffeySupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
- Tweel v. West Virginia Racing CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
- Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific R. Co. v. LiddleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
- Frankel v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
- City of Juneau v. Badger Co-operative Oil Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.