Commonwealth v. DiNicola
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WIEAND, Judge:
This appeal was taken from a pre-trial order which denied a defense motion to dismiss criminal charges on grounds that double jeopardy principles barred the retrial ordered by the Supreme Court.1 We agree with the trial court that a second trial is not barred by principles of double jeopardy; and, therefore, we affirm.
Louis P. DiNicola was tried by jury and was found guilty of arson and second degree murder. Post-verdict motions were denied, and a judgment of sentence was imposed. The judgment of sentence was affirmed by this Court on direct appeal. Commonwealth v. DiNicola, 308…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Commonwealth v. HudeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. HaefnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. SmoyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. BeaverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Commonwealth v. DiNicolaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985