Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. DiNicola

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 6, 1985No. 290PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

This appeal was taken from a pre-trial order which denied a defense motion to dismiss criminal charges on grounds that double jeopardy principles barred the retrial ordered by the Supreme Court.1 We agree with the trial court that a second trial is not barred by principles of double jeopardy; and, therefore, we affirm.

Louis P. DiNicola was tried by jury and was found guilty of arson and second degree murder. Post-verdict motions were denied, and a judgment of sentence was imposed. The judgment of sentence was affirmed by this Court on direct appeal. Commonwealth v. DiNicola, 308…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Commonwealth v. HudeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Commonwealth v. HaefnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Commonwealth v. SmoyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. BeaverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. DiNicolaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API