Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hude

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 31, 1980No. 47PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*607OPINION

NIX, Justice.

These two appeals present the same question of law: may a defendant be tried for perjury arising out of statements he made in a prior trial in which he was acquitted of the charges brought against him? We have consolidated these appeals to address this common issue.

I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Hude Appeal

Appellant, Manfred Hude, was charged with twenty counts of possession and delivery of marijuana and one count of corruption of a minor. The charges arose out of a series of sales of marijuana to the same individual which were alleged to have occurred between October 1974 and…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HudeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Commonwealth v. BradySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. CohenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API