Legal Opinion

Francis v. Southern Pacific Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 15, 1948No. 400PublishedCited by 118 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas

Petitioners are the minor children of Jack R. Francis who was killed while riding as an interstate passenger on one of respondent’s trains. They brought this suit, acting through their general guardians, to recover damages on account of his death. Jurisdiction in the federal court was founded on diversity of citizenship. The trial judge submitted to the jury only the question of respondent’s wanton negligence. The error alleged is his refusal to submit to the jury the issue of ordinary negligence. The jury returned a verdict for respondent. The Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed. 162 F.2d 813.

*447T…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Helvering v. HallockSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Thiel v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Hecht v. MalleySupreme Court of the United States · 1924

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by118 opinions

  1. Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Community Dental Services, Dba Smilecare Dental Group v. Stuart Tani, DdsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. State v. MenziesUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Douglas v. Seacoast Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Atkins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977

113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API