Taigman v. Forsberg
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. This cause comes here on an appeal from a final decree entered in the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York, which decree was entered on September 21, 1914, and dismissed the complainant’s bill. The complainant is a citizen of the United States and a resident of the borough of Manhattan, city and state of New York.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. This cause comes here on an appeal from a final decree entered in the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York, which decree was entered on September 21, 1914, and dismissed the complainant’s bill. The complainant is a citizen of the United States and a resident of the borough of Manhattan, city and state of New York. The defendant is a citizen of the United States, residing in the state of New York, and maintains an established place of business within the Southern…
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Circuit Judge.
This is a suit in equity arising under the patent laws of the United States. The plaintiff alleges that he is the sole owner of United States letters patent No. 1,044,944 granted to him on November 19, 1912, for pulley brake for motor-controlled apparatus. He also„alleges that he is the owner of an undivided two-*788thirds interest in United States letters patent No. 984,327, granted on February 14, 1911, to himself and D. Wald and O. C. Britsch for motor-controlled apparatus; the plaintiff’s two-third interest in the said patent being his own undivided one-third interest…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Coffin v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Cantrell v. WallickSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Thayer v. HartU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1884
- American Bell Telephone Co. v. People's Telephone Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1884
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Guy v. SteinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1916
- Taigman v. DesureCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
- Toch v. Zibell Damp Resisting Paint Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
- Perkins Glue Co. v. Crandall Panel Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1923