St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. Henson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
PINKHAM, C.
Tbis action was instituted on tbe 2nd day of October, 1922, by Theodocia Annie Henson, adminis-tratrix of the estate of LeRoy Henson, deceased, defendant in error, as plaintiff, .against tbe St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company, plaintiff in error, as defendant, to recover damages wbicb sbe sustained as administratrix through tbe alleged negligence of tbe said railway company, wbicb resulted in tbe death of the said LeRoy Henson. Tbe parties will be referred to as plaintiff and defendant, as they appeared in ■the trial court.
Plaintiff’s petition alleges that .-be s* id…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- McGovern v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. MoffattSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
- Big Jack Mining Co. v. ParkinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Lusk v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cushing Refining & Gasoline Co. v. DeshanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Evlo Refining & Marketing Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- St. Louis-S. F. R. Co. v. SearsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939