People v. Pittam
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Per curiam
An inquiry panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved a stipulation, agreement and conditional admission of misconduct, C.R.C.P. 241.18, between the respondent and the assistant disciplinary counsel. The inquiry panel recommended that the respondent receive a public censure for practicing law while under an order of suspension. Given the unusual circumstances of this case, we accept the conditional admission, and publicly censure the respondent.
I
The respondent was admitted to the Colorado bar in 1969. In the conditional admission, the parties stipulated to the following facts and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. JamesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- People v. WilsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- People v. RossSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- People v. PittamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- People v. PittamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. CainSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998