Legal Opinion

People v. Pittam

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1996No. 96SA108PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

An inquiry panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved a stipulation, agreement and conditional admission of misconduct, C.R.C.P. 241.18, between the respondent and the assistant disciplinary counsel. The inquiry panel recommended that the respondent receive a public censure for practicing law while under an order of suspension. Given the unusual circumstances of this case, we accept the conditional admission, and publicly censure the respondent.

I

The respondent was admitted to the Colorado bar in 1969. In the conditional admission, the parties stipulated to the following facts and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. JamesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  2. People v. WilsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  3. People v. RossSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  4. People v. PittamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  5. People v. PittamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. CainSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API