Legal Opinion

People v. Cain

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 13, 1998No. 98SA33PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The respondent in this lawyer discipline ease was suspended for ninety days in 1990, see People v. Cain, 791 P.2d 1133 (Colo.1990), and he has not been reinstated. Nevertheless, in 1994 he engaged in the practice of law while suspended. A hearing panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the findings and recommendation of a hearing board that the respondent receive a public censure. Because of the unusual facts of this case, we accept the recommendation.

I

The respondent was admitted to practice law in Colorado in 1954. He did not answer the formal complaint filed in this case and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Conway-Bogue Realty Investment Co. v. Denver Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  2. People v. PiersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  3. People v. RossSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  4. People v. CainSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  5. People v. PittamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re OlsenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014
  2. People v. MasonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
  3. People v. SwartsSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
  4. People v. SwartsSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
  5. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO Complainant: v. KRISTIN MARIE MUSCATO, 47850 Respondent:Supreme Court of Colorado · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API