Legal Opinion

Dandy v. American Laundry MacHinery Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 12, 1990No. 23172PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gregory, Chief Justice:

The following three questions have been certified to this Court by the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina:

1. Under South Carolina law, does delivery of a summons and complaint to a private process server commence an action and thereby toll the applicable statute of limitations?

2. Under South Carolina law, does mailing a summons and complaint pursuant to the State’s longarm statute toll the applicable statute of limitations as of the date of mailing?

3. Under South Carolina law, does a foreign corporation’s appointment of a registered agent in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cutino v. RamseySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  2. Harris v. DunlapSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  3. Able v. SchweitzerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Catawba Indian Tribe of South Carolina v. State of S.C.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  2. Atlas Food Systems & Services, Inc. v. Crane National Vendors Division of Unidynamics Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  3. Garner Ex Rel. Estate of Garner v. HouckSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  4. Witt v. AMERICAN TRUCKING ASS'N, INC.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1994
  5. Catawba Indian Tribe of South Carolina v. South CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API