Legal Opinion

Palmcroft Development Co. v. City of Phoenix

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1935No. Civil No. 3458PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

— The appellant has filed a motion in which we are asked to modify the direction for judgment in its favor so as to give it interest at the legal rate of 6 per cent, from the date the debt became due and payable, or at least from the date of the entry of judgment. The appellee city, although served with copy of the motion, does not resist it. The judgment therefore will be modified so as to allow interest at the legal rate of 6 per cent, from the date that the different loans became due and payable to the plaintiff and his assignors.

The contract stipulated that the loans were made to be…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. City of Mesa v. KillingsworthArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Adams v. BolinArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Fluor Corp. v. United States ex rel. Mosher Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  4. City of Phoenix v. KiddArizona Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Gustafson v. RajkovichArizona Supreme Court · 1953

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API