Legal Opinion

Galster v. Woods

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 24, 1985No. Docket Nos. A021109, A020975PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SMITH, J.

The question posed on this appeal and petition for writ of mandate is whether state officials charged with implementing and administering the aid to families with dependent children (AFDC) program may, consistently with federal and state law, deem a property interest held by an applicant or recipient to be “available” for support and maintenance, and hence countable in computing dollar-amount “resource” limits governing eligibility for benefits, when the applicant or recipient has demonstrated that, despite diligent and good faith efforts to sell or otherwise gain access to…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Shea v. VialpandoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Heckler v. TurnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. LedererSupreme Court of the United States · 1920

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Davis v. LukhardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  2. Bell v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. Jacqueline Davis, Mary E. Spencer, Patricia De Franzo, and Peggy Staton, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. William L. Lukhard, Individually and in His Capacity as Commissioner of the Virginia Department of Social Services, and Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, Peggy Staton, Ethel Shepard, and Alberta Shields, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. William L. Lukhard, Individually and in His Capacity as Commissioner of the Virginia Department of Social Services, and Margaret M. Heckler, Individually and in Her Capacity as the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  4. Paleski v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICESCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. Bell v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API