Legal Opinion

Bell v. Department of Motor Vehicles

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 30, 1992No. A056920PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

The Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) appeals from a judgment granting respondent Michael A. Bell’s petition for a writ of mandate and ordering the DMV to set aside the suspension of Bell’s driving privilege. It contends that substantial evidence does not support the trial court’s decision to overturn the suspension order. We agree. Therefore, we reverse and direct the trial court to deny Bell’s petition.

Factual and Procedural Background

While on patrol, California Highway Patrol (CHP) Officer J. Perez and another officer observed Bell “come out of a club” and drive away with…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Marina Point, Ltd. v. WolfsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. County of Los Angeles v. FrisbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Yakov v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. In Re HainesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Gikas v. ZolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Lake v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Singh v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. People v. KronckeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. Brown v. ValverdeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API