State Ex Rel. Employment Security Commission v. Jarrell
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtErvin, J.
Under the statute providing for judicial review of the decisions of the Employment Security Commission, the findings of fact of the Commission are binding upon the reviewing court if supported by evidence, and the judicial review is limited to determining whether errors of law have been committed by the Commission. G.S. 96-15 (i); Unemployment Compensation Comm. v. Harvey & Son Co., 227 N.C. 291, 42 S.E. 2d 86; In re Steelman, 219 N.C. 306, 13 S.E. 2d 544, 135 A.L.R. 929. For this reason, the function of the reviewing court is ordinarily twofold: (1) To determine whether there was evidence…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rader v. Queen City Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- In Re SteelmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Smith v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Smith v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Russos v. . BaileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Intercraft Industries Corp. v. MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Peaden v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Matter of VinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- Carolina Power & Light Co. v. Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
- Matter of EnochCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.