Legal Opinion

Will of Garrecht v. Willison

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1928PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEschweiler, J.

The main objections urged to the proceedings below are: that there was no due execution of the instrument; that the alleged execution of the same was *598procured by undue influence exercised upon the maker; that she was at the time of unsound mind; that she had an undue and unnatural obsession towards, and hatred of, the contestant, her oldest child.

Upon the hearing the death of said witness Anton Larson was shown. The other witness, Mrs. Seidler, who had known the deceased for many years and had been employed by her, testified that she was called to the sitting room in the boarding house where…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Nunn v. EhlertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. Will of SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Kimball v. AdamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Senour Manufacturing Co. v. ClarkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Skinner v. American Bible SocietyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Strahota v. StrahotaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Will of Keith v. ProffitWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API